Pass the Remote: Online News
by: Elliot Panek, Kristen Grant and Elaine Baumgartel
Considering the internet as a primary news source.
A Critical Forum on Media and Culture
A Critical Forum on Media and Culture
Pass the Remote: Online News
by: Elliot Panek, Kristen Grant and Elaine Baumgartel
Considering the internet as a primary news source.
Four Strategies for Media Reform
by: Michael Curtin / University of Wisconsin-Madison
Four concrete suggestions for reforming media.
Why Fiske Still Matters
by: Henry Jenkins / Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Despite Aniko Bodroghkozy’s claim that McChesney “rules”, Fiske still matters.
Embodied
by: Cynthia Fuchs / George Mason University
A consideration of the various uses of mediums in the new Patricia Arquette series Medium.
Benny Hill and Reviving British Comedy
by: Anna McCarthy / New York University
Why the recent interest in British comedy? McCarthy examines the BBC’s Benny Hill Show marathon, Little Britain, and The Office.
Digital: The Dark Side
by: Robert Schrag / North Carolina State University
How digital creative tools blur the lines between fantasy and reality, creation and cutting-and-pasting, and why that might not be such a good thing.
Legal Fictions
by: Eric M. Greenfield
What the law has to say about the distortion of character that is a staple of fact-based entertainment.
This Issue on Flow (27 May 2005)
by: David Gurney / FLOW Staff
Welcome to Issue 5.
Media Studies for the Hell of It?: Second Thoughts on McChesney and Fiske
by: Aniko Bodroghkozy / University of Virginia
Why and how do you study media?
Pass the Remote: The iGeneration
by: Jessica Birthisel, Lindsay Bosch, and Beth Bonnstetter
A consideration of the Internet generation’s experience of human-to-human relations.
The Loss of Value (or the Value of Lost)
by: Jason Mittell / Middlebury College
I wish to make a claim that may be the most controversial position as yet argued in Flow‘s brief but vibrant first year: Lost is the best show on American broadcast television.
I Got Plenty of Nothing (and Nothing’s Plenty for Me): Television’s Politics of Abundance
by: Dana Polan / New York University
Increasingly, U. S. television reveals itself to have a voracious appetite for material, and there seems to be no limits to its ability to generate new subject matter. There is no visuality or topic so eccentric that television can’t go after them.