This Issue on Flow (27 May 2005)
by: David Gurney / FLOW Staff
Welcome to Issue 5.
A Critical Forum on Media and Culture
A Critical Forum on Media and Culture
This Issue on Flow (27 May 2005)
by: David Gurney / FLOW Staff
Welcome to Issue 5.
Media Studies for the Hell of It?: Second Thoughts on McChesney and Fiske
by: Aniko Bodroghkozy / University of Virginia
Why and how do you study media?
Pass the Remote: The iGeneration
by: Jessica Birthisel, Lindsay Bosch, and Beth Bonnstetter
A consideration of the Internet generation’s experience of human-to-human relations.
The Loss of Value (or the Value of Lost)
by: Jason Mittell / Middlebury College
I wish to make a claim that may be the most controversial position as yet argued in Flow‘s brief but vibrant first year: Lost is the best show on American broadcast television.
I Got Plenty of Nothing (and Nothing’s Plenty for Me): Television’s Politics of Abundance
by: Dana Polan / New York University
Increasingly, U. S. television reveals itself to have a voracious appetite for material, and there seems to be no limits to its ability to generate new subject matter. There is no visuality or topic so eccentric that television can’t go after them.
“Can There Be Television Without Star Trek?”
by: Walter Metz / Montana State University at Bozeman
Canceling shows such as Enterprise is amputating parts of our collective history with television.
Live Richly, and Prosper
by: Daniel Marcus / Goucher College
What is Citibank selling?
Northeastern India: Satellite TV’s Forgotten Spectator
by: Kallol Bhattacherjee / Jawaharlal Nehru University
Did satellite TV help to change the identity of Northeastern India?